Archive for October, 2006

ACC Football Week #9: Preview

Implications abound, emotions will be high, and whatever other cliches I can come up with between now and the end of this post.

Divisional Implications

#10 Clemson at Virginia Tech, Thursday, 7:30 ESPN

As much as you can have a must win, this fits the bill where Jacksonville is concerned. VT with three losses will not see the inside of a Jacksonville hotel room in December. Clemson with two losses will be on shaky ground because when you factor in the tiebreaker with Boston College they are theoretically a game back of the Eagles. BC has Wake Forest and Miami on the road with Duke and Maryland at home. I would think their chances of going 3-1 on the rest of the ACC schedule is really good and 4-0 is not out of reach. Clemson needs this win to stay in control and still hope for a 3-1 BC. The major factor tonight is the shoulder injury to James Davis after scorching the earth under the Georgia Tech defense last week for over 200 yards.

Clemson 28 Virginia Tech 17

Miami at #21 Georgia Tech, 3:30 PM, ABC

The winner of this game assumes outright control of the Coastal division and controls the tiebreaker between these two teams. Obviously we will have an idea after tonight if GT and Miami are in a two horse race or if a two loss VT is still viable. Miami gets the dirty dozen from the FIU brawl back for this game and have wide receiver Ryan Moore available even though he is still facing charges connected to an assault he committed in August. It would seem that Miami has learned the lessons of the FIU brawl well. I just do not think Miami has a viable enough offense to hang with the Yellow Jackets.

Georgia Tech 34 Miami 14

Florida State at Maryland, 7:00 PM, ESPN2

By the way, Maryland only has one loss which means they are still alive and well in the Atlantic division. Now granted they will probably lose to Clemson and Boston College down the road but a win against FSU would not only five FSU an unprecedented four ACC losses but keep the Terps in the mix, for now. A win would also make Maryland bowl eligible and give their fans some inkling that the whole thing is not crashing down around them.

Maryland 21 FSU 20

High Emotions

#24 Wake Forest at UNC, 3:30 PM, ESPNU

Bunting is in his final five games so look for tons of adrenaline and players trying to win one for the Bunter or something cheesy like that. Unfortunately they will fail.

Wake Forest 35 UNC 10

Vanderbilt at Duke, 1:00 PM

Duke had two chances last week beat Miami and could not get it done. This week offers another chance against a team that is not even on the same level as Wake Forest, Alabama, or Miami. So Duke should have a shot, playing at home to get of the big fat 0 in their record. Then again Vandy did beat Georgia so it may not be as easy as people think. I still have trouble seeing Duke winning a game.

Vanderbilt 20 Duke 10

NC State at Virginia, 12:00 PM, Raycom/LF

Since NC State can only win against I-A opposition when playing at Carter Finley at night on ESPN then we must assume that they are already behind the eight ball considering they are 0-3 in noon starts versus I-A teams. UVa played Maryland close, beat UNC handily(not a big deal mind you), but even NC State should not have problem here. If they do they will be 3-5 and have a very tough road to being bowl eligible.

NC State 24 UVa 21

Laughing Matter

Buffalo at Boston College, 1:00 PM

And that is not the Buffalo Bills, apparently there is actually a college there too. They are also not very good in football. In fact Tom O’Brien should give serious thought to play Matt Ryan sparingly in this one to further heal that foot ahead of the big showdown in Winston-Salem next week.

Boston College 42 Buffalo 0

Last Week: 5-1
This Season: 46-15

Share This Post:
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [MySpace] [Technorati] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

Miami’s Decisionmaking Never Ceases to Amaze Me

Miami is two weeks removed from a huge brawl for which they handed down 12 one game suspensions. The administration in Coral Gables also did a lot of posturing as well as tough talk about how they would crack down on bad behavior. So in light of these events, what is the one thing you could do that would be a total confirmation that your are still full of crap when it comes to cleaning up your image? How about reinstating a receiver you had suspended indefinitely because he assaulted a woman. That’s right Larry Coker has reinstated Ryan Moore for the Georgia Tech game which has gigantic Coastal division implications. This is also the reason why 12 players only missed the Duke game and not anything else.

I want to know why someone at Miami does not come in and tell Coker that reinstating a player, who still has charges pending, before your most important game of the season reeks of being more concerned with winning than anything else. And yes winning is important but shouldn’t you at least wait until his legal troubles have past before putting him in a game? Not according to Larry Coker:

“He’s been suspended for, what now, seven games? That’s a pretty harsh punishment,” Coker said. “The perception, I don’t know what the perception is going to be. I know what the right thing to do is. … We’re going to move forward.”

I really do not how Larry Coker sleeps at night. I think we need an expanded definition of what harsh means. Harsh, in my opinion, is being a woman and having a 6-3, 215 lb football player kick the side of your car, grab you by the neck, and push you to the ground. Being suspended seven games is not harsh compared to that and actually it is only five games for the assault because Moore had actually already been suspended for the Peach Bowl last season and the first two games of this season before it was extended following his legal snafu. It also should be noted that Miami safety Anthony Reddick, who was the helmet swinger during the FIU brawl, also received an indefinite suspension which means that the two actions have essentially been ajudicated the same way making them for all intents and purposes morally equivalent.

So once again Miami misses the point because Donna Shalala is bound and determined not to “throw anyone under the bus” for the sake of the school’s reputation.  This is not a matter of giving a player a second third chance, this is just being plain stupid.

Share This Post:
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [MySpace] [Technorati] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

The Coaching Search: Day 3[UPDATED]

There are way too many articles out there right now. I have not read much nor do I have the time to comment on every piece. I think I am going to let the day ride out here and offer some commentary this evening, unless something breaks. Here are all the relevant articles my trusty RSS feed aggregator gave me this morning.

News and Observer

Bunting refused to resign
Aiding UNC’s search

Davis wants to coach again, but not necessarily at UNC
Caulton Tudor: Heels’ next coach should have…

Durham Herald Sun

Baddour resists naming names
Frank Dascenzo: This time, Baddour needs to get it right

North Carolina AD: No timetable for coaching search

Charlotte Observer

Langston Wertz: Heels need to step on it
Davis expresses interest in UNC

News and Record

UNC recruits must make choice again
Firing gives UNC a head start

Fayetteville Observer

Agent: Davis shows interest in UNC football job

Winston-Salem Journal

Three recruits say they’ll stick with UNC
Kragthorpe, Rodriguez, Johnson said to be on UNC’s wish list
Search for UNC coach may have familiar feel

David Glenn’s ACC Journal

UNC Search Hard To Figure (It’s Early)

850/620 Blog

Stop, Rumor Time[UPDATED]

Share This Post:
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [MySpace] [Technorati] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

Even More Coaching Search News

I can see this is going to be a long road, though all this flurry could be because we are early in the process.  I can only hope it slows down because I will have a lot of troube keeping pace otherwise. Here is what have at the end of the second day.

Turns out I was probably right about Butch Davis.  Caulton Tudor took it upon himself to contact Davis at his home in Ohio and Davis spoke about returning to coaching in general terms not mentioning UNC specifically:

“For me to say anything at all would be extremely premature. All I’m willing to say is that North Carolina’s a great job in my opinion,” Davis said. “I’m just saying in the most general sense, I want to get back in coaching, and that could be either the college level or the NFL.”

That seems to be a little scaled back from the earlier statement to the Charlotte Observer.  I think he is just playing the PR game and he is correct in pointing out it is still early in the process.  If UNC learned anything from the NC State basketball search they will deal with Davis right away and get a definitive, out of the public eye indication of his intentions so the search does not get bogged down with an embarassing courtship and rejection.

As for the process itself, Dick Baddour has indicated he will not use a formal search committee to find a new coach.  And in response to that news, a good portion of the UNC fanbase threw up in their mouth a little: 

“Hiring at this level is a lot about being able to maintain a level of confidence, so not having a large formal committee is helpful in the sense that you decrease the opportunity for speculation and word getting out — and thereby discouraging qualified applicants,” Baddour said. “It’s worthwhile to have the knowledge and experience and expertise of others, but you can get that without a formal committee.”

I honestly think the N&O printed that headline just to scare UNC fans to the death.  Actually what Baddour says here makes sense.  A large formalized committee has certain pitfalls, the most prominent being the leaking of information to the media.  Those kinds of leaks, which I pointed out earlier in reference to the Fayeteville Observer’s “source” can have a detrimental impact on a search of this nature.  It should also be noted that even the presence of a committee would not necessarily take decision out of Baddour’s hands unless James Moeser or Erskine Bowles dictated it would be that way.  If my understanding of the hierarchy at UNC is correct Baddour is still the AD and it is still his hire to make.  One can only hope he does a lot of listening to very knowledgeable people and makes a decision based on that information not on his own.

Share This Post:
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [MySpace] [Technorati] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

Coaching Search Rumor of the Day #2

Now, I spent some time in the last post lambasting “sources” who were out there telling the media who the top candidate for UNC’s coaching search was to the detriment of the search itself.

However, quotes from a potential candidate on his possible interest in the job is different altogether and actually may not be construed as rumor. According to the Charlotte Observer, Butch Davis is interested in the UNC job:

“I don’t know what direction they’re going to go in,” he said by telephone, “but I definitely am interested, and I’m interested in getting back into coaching.”

Davis, an analyst for the NFL Network, said it was “premature” to discuss the job or his interest in further detail because North Carolina is just beginning its search process with dismissed coach John Bunting directing the team through the end of the season.

How much is there to get excited about here? Not too much in my opinion. He says he is interested but also interested in getting back into coaching in general. Davis is a smart guy and he knows that at the very least he should put his name in the hat to keep his options open. I am disturbed by the fact he expressed interest publically which might be indicative of him pressing his own agenda. Davis or his agent can(and may have for all I know) easily pick up a phone and express interest. Anything outside of that is most likely self serving. Davis has been widely rumored to be in the $2 million a year range in salary which is outside of UNC’s ballpark given the financial commitments to the basketball program and buying out the former football coach. So take his comments for what they are worth. I think he is playing the PR game for his own benefit, not because he actually wants the job.

Now that being said….

UNC should absolutely offer him the job as soon as possible with the best contract they can muster and then give him a limited time window to respond so they can move on if he is simply playing games.  If it is a bluff on Davis’ part then call it right now and let’s move on, otherwise you end up chasing him around for a week while everyone laughs at you.

And also, for the love the Old Well, do it in secret and do not use in publically tracked planes in the process either.

Share This Post:
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [MySpace] [Technorati] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

Coaching Search Rumor of the Day

This one courtesy of the Fayetteville Observer:

Sources told The Fayetteville Observer that UNC’s first target will be Steve Kragthorpe of Tulsa.

“Our top guy is at Tulsa,’’ the source said. “He was described to me as this year’s Urban Meyer.’’

Multiple sources said early Monday that UNC’s first choice would be Butch Davis, who last coached the NFL’s Cleveland Browns for four years before resigning in 2004. But several national reports, including one by CNN/SI.com said Davis may be more interested in coaching Alabama, if that job comes open.

“I don’t even think we’re talking to Butch Davis,’’ a source told The Observer.

West Virginia’s Rich Rodriguez and Navy’s Paul Johnson are others who may be contacted by UNC.

Okay, who can spot the blatant contradiction in the article?  That’s right the assertion that Kragthorpe is the top candidate followed by an assertion that, according to multiple sources, Butch Davis is the top candidate.  The latter tidbit is also not refuted by any of the sources but my rumors in the national media.  Then the Kragthorpe source follows up and says they are not even talking to Butch Davis.  And, Rich Rodriguez and Paul Johnson are also on the list too.

My take on this?  There is no way UNC is going to fully publicize their candidate list with details on who is on top of it at this point.   The source could be correct but I also think the source needs to shut up because if we learned anything from the NC State coaching search it is this thing can get really messy really fast the more the general public knows about what is happening behind the scenes.  Part of this game is managing coaches’ egos and some will be turned off by the idea that they are third or fourth choice so the last thing you want is everyone knowing who you considered to be the first or second or third choice before you talked to the next guy on the list.   Another part of this game is that everyone besides Butch Davis is right in the middle of a season and if they are discussing the job they would do so quietly as not to upset their current school or team.  The last think Kragthorpe wants to do is have to answer questions about whether he is talking to UNC or not.

So in my honest opinion the source or sources need to do the coaching search a favor and stay away from the media.  UNC administrators and boosters should all be in deep discussions now trying to put together a working strategy on building a football program and then decide which coach best fits the plan they have in place.  It is way too early in the process to be leaking candidate preferences to the media.

Share This Post:
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [MySpace] [Technorati] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

The Coaching Search: Day 2

Joe Ovies at the 850/620 blog has a nice roundup of articles on the press conference yesterday as well as other issues.

As we move forward, most of the attention will be turned towards how the recruits will react since the upcoming class is highly touted.  Mike Paulus, the 10th ranked QB in the class and brother of Duke’s Greg Paulus, says he is in wait and see mode.  Durham Hillside linebacker Jonathan Smith says he is still committed to UNC.  I would imagine the rest of them are probably doing what Paulus is doing to see who gets hired to head the program.

Steve Logan was on 620 this morning and made a very good point that the first thing UNC needs to do is not draw up a list of candidates but gather all of the influential people together behind closed doors and map out what they want UNC football to look like and determine its importance at North Carolina.  Based on that “profile” UNC should then start looking at the candidates to locate the best fit for the program.  Logan said most schools turn it into a “beauty contest” where they pursue coach after coach based on popularity or the so called “big name” label and when it is over they end up hiring the wrong person.  This of course is how UNC ended up where it is today.

I think Logan is correct and UNC needs to draw up a plan which lays out the goals for the football program and then hire someone based on those criteria.

And they also should stick Dick Baddour in a corner with some toys and tell him to play quietly while the grown-ups have their meeting.

Share This Post:
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [MySpace] [Technorati] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

The Short List

Now that UNC has given John Bunting his noticed aside from groveling about for our dignity during the last five games of the season, the administration will be engaging in a coaching search. Now, Dick Baddour’s record on searching for a coach to head the two major revenue programs at UNC is abysmal. In fact it’s worse than abysmal considering that he is the only AD I know to hire and fire two football coaches as well as overseeing the hiring and forced resignation of the basketball coach in a major basketball program. So our first hope is that Baddour is kept far away from the process or listens to someone more versed in such things than himself. And it appears that might be the case since during the press conference today he indicated that UNC would retain the services of Chuck Neinas. Neinas is well known for assisting major college programs in their search for coaches and athletic directors which also makes me wonder if he would be willing to give UNC a two for the price of one deal.

Continue reading ‘The Short List’

Share This Post:
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [MySpace] [Technorati] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

Media Roundup and Bunting Press Conference

According to David Glenn this morning on 620 AM Bunting was asked to resign but refused so he was fired effective at the end of the Duke game.  One the financial side it makes sense for Bunting to forced them to fire him so he can collect the buyout.  However, I honestly think that Bunting, being the passionate UNC guys he is and eternal optimist, did not resign because he honestly felt like it would “get better.”   It is things like this regarding his character and outlook which make such a firing difficult.  You can only wish he had found a way to win along with all of the other positive things about the way he carried himself.

Caulton Tudor, who was the first to call for Bunting’s ouster weighs in with his thoughts.  Tudor points to the loss of defensive coordinator Jon Tenuta to Georgia Tech as the single most important loss Bunting suffered.  Tudor also says the learning curve on issues such as building an offense and recruiting make Bunting’s job difficult.  He fails to mention the loss of players to discipline problems which is fine with me because I am tired of that being used as a crutch for a program that is struggling like this one is now.

Tom Suiter at WRAL.com blogged his take on the situation.

As for the press conference I listened to it via WRAL.com and it held nothing too earth shatterin.  Inside Carolina has excerpts of the press conference here.  Here are a few excerpts of interest:

On accumulating so many losses -

Bunting: About half those losses are in ’02 and ’03. I’m in charge of the program at that point, but I can tell you I not entirely responsible for that. We didn’t have many players to play with. Since the ’04 and ’05 season, we’ve been extremely competitive until this season, and this season has been a struggle.”

In my opinion this is a cop out on Bunting’s part and of the few times I have seen him make an excuse.  I am assuming he is referring to the attrition that occurred during the transistion as well as discipline problems.  I think that is a mitgating factor but he even says that he is “in charge of the program at that point” so yes he is entirely responsible for what happens under him.  Had he been winning I am sure he would have taken full responsibility for what was happening at that point but since he was 3-9 and 2-10 then he is opting to make an excuse.  He is right that they have won more in the two seasons prior to this one but this season is such a step back it is difficult to keep going.  As for the number of losses, UNC is 25-42 under Bunting with 19 losses coming in the 02/03 stretch.  In fact the first three seasons under Bunting included 24 losses.  Counting the past two seasons and the present one, the loss total is present at 17 with five games left.  UNC will most likely end up losing four of the next five and if that is the case the loss total will be 21 in the final three years.  That constitutes only a slight improvement on the first three seasons, so he can complain as much as he wants about 02 and 03 but the numbers since then are not really much better when supposedly he had the players he wanted.

Bunting when asked why he disagreed with the decision -

Bunting: “We’re redshirting an entire class right now, and we have an unbelievable recruiting class that we’re on top of.”

I would characterize this as too little, too late.  I think had Bunting figured out two years ago or perhaps been able to redshirt whole classes like Jim Grobe does at Wake Forest he might be in better shape now.  And yes there is a great class coming in but there comes a point where you cannot continue to operate on the promise of success when after six years similar promises are left unfulfilled.  Also, Bunting is the eternal optimist and all of those statements he makes in press conferences about “getting better” and “reaching the point where they yada, yada, yada” are statements he truly believes.

Baddour when asked why he said recently he would never let Bunting go during the season -

Baddour: “When I was asked that question, I understood that question to be, ‘Would there be a circumstance under which Coach Bunting would not be allowed to finish coaching this season. So my answer had to do with him finishing coaching the season. In fact, we would be here today if we had a different answer to that. It’s extremely important to me – imperative – that he be allowed to finish the season. That was my answer to that.”

Yeah, Dick, whatever you want to believe here.  You know full well no one was asking Bunting to be fired and relieved of his duties on the spot following the Clemson game when you so forcefully said he would not be fired.

Why make the decision now as opposed to the end of the year?

Baddour: “That is certainly a fair question, and one that we talked about. When it became apparent to me that we were going to have to make a change, we could have been in a position where we started to talk about and evaluate the program in some serious way, and I felt like we were already being bombarded with those questions that it could only create a more severe difficult situation for the players and the staff to operate in. I felt like that was unfair to the football program, especially if we knew the direction where we were going, and we should do that now, if John was willing to finish coaching this year.”

Yes, and the rumor on Friday may have forced your hand but we may never know if that was the case.  I think it is a better situation in terms of starting the coaching search now.  If I am not mistaken this is the first firing of the college football season so it should be somewhat beneficial to be the first BCS level job out there for the purposes of contacting candidates, even through liasions, early on here.  It also removes the distractions and no one has to answer the same questions over and over for the next five games.

So I think that is all we can say about this.  If I come across any other tidbits of interest I might post them otherwise all eyes shift towards finding a new coach and finding some sembalance of dignity during the remainder of the season.

Share This Post:
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [MySpace] [Technorati] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

UNC Picked to Win ACC

Not that this is a total shock to anyone but UNC was the overwhelming and nearly unanimous choice to win the ACC by the conference media. Tyler Hansbrough was also tapped as the preseason first team All ACC and Player of the Year. Senior Reyshawn Terry was picked on the second team. Tywon Lawson and Wayne Ellington were second and fourth in Rookie of the Year voting. UNC received 59 of 62 possible first place votes with two going to Duke and one to Boston College. The poll lined up pretty much as one might expected with the only real surprise being Florida State and Virginia Tech in the fifth and sixth slots. I tend to lean towards Maryland and Virginia being better than seventh and eight. I also expect Wake Forest to be better than 10th place. NC State may surprise people and find a way out of the cellar but they only have five players known to be ACC level players and a coach who has been out of the college game for a long time.

All-ACC First Team
Tyler Hansbrough, UNC, 62
Jared Dudley, BC, 58
Sean Singletary, UVa, 53
Al Thornton, FSU, 53
Josh McRoberts, Duke, 52

All-ACC Second Team
Anthony Morrow, GT, 7
Coleman Collins, VT, 6
Reyshawn Terry, UNC, 4
J.R. Reynolds, UVa, 4
Zabian Dowdell, VT, 2

ACC Player of the Year
Tyler Hansbrough, UNC, 48
Al Thornton, FSU, 4
Josh McRoberts, Duke, 4
Sean Singletary, UVa, 3
Jared Dudley, BC, 3

ACC Rookie of the Year
Thaddeus Young, GT, 24
Ty Lawson, UNC, 15
Javaris Crittenton, GT, 4
Wayne Ellington, UNC, 2
six others with 1 vote

2006-07 ACC Men’s Basketball Media Preseason Poll

Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Points
North Carolina 59 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 741
Duke 2 37 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 660
Boston College 1 20 25 12 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 619
Georgia Tech 0 1 13 30 10 1 1 4 1 1 0 0 531
Florida State 0 1 1 5 14 15 11 6 5 3 1 0 410
Virginia Tech 0 0 0 4 13 14 11 10 5 1 4 0 385
Maryland 0 0 0 3 9 15 10 13 10 2 0 0 375
Virginia 0 0 1 5 9 11 12 9 6 4 3 2 365
Clemson 0 0 0 0 3 2 12 15 15 8 5 2 281
Wake Forest 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 4 8 13 17 15 177
Miami 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 8 21 19 10 173
NC State 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 4 9 13 33 119

Source: ACC

Share This Post:
[Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [MySpace] [Technorati] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]