Now that we have established that Marvin Austin is Keyser Soze (HT: Capt. ButchRoy), it is time to debunk the weak story that Don Kausler, Jr. of the Birmingham News ran on Wednesday in which poor Marcell Dareus was lured to Miami under “false pretense” and therefore any contact with agents is Austin’s fault, while Dareus remains clean as the pure driven snow.
It’s time to call bovine excrement on the story because thanks to UNC’s official silence and the dearth of hard information, this bogus story is gaining legs in the blogosphere.
I have no evidence of any of this, as this is simply one person’s analysis, from someone who worked in college athletics and dealt with compliance for five years. Let me further offer the disclaimer that, over the course of this story, Dareus’ mother died and that is very sad and I am truly sorry for his loss.
With that being said, let’s take a look at the story:
The entire piece is sourced to an anonymous person “close to the family.”
Really? This entire sordid affair, from Austin to Little to Saunders to Dareus has been sourced anonymously by people “close” or “with knowledge of” the situation. How much of that is actually true? And if the source really is close to the family, wouldn’t they have a vested interest in keeping Dareus’ name clean rather than admit his involvement?
“The plane fare to Miami was paid for by Austin, but when Dareus arrived in Miami, he paid Austin for the ticket and received a receipt, the source said. Austin also arranged for a hotel room, but the source said Dareus did not use the room.”
So the source has proof Austin paid for the ticket? And Dareus carries enough walking-around cash to pay Austin back for a plane ticket the moment he arrives. And Austin carries a receipt book with him at all times, I’m sure. And if Dareus didn’t stay in the room Austin arranged for him, where did he stay? The YMCA?
“As his mother lay dying in her Birmingham home, Marcell Dareus couldn’t cope. He had to get away. Along came an invitation from a friend to fly to Miami. The chance to hang out in South Beach sounded good, so off Dareus went to chill in the sun, sand and warm water…Dareus attended the party but claims he was lured to Miami under a false pretense, a source close to the family said.”
Where was the false pretense? What 21 year-old would turn down a trip to South Beach? And what 21 year-old doesn’t hope to hit a party in South Beach? And when exactly did Dareus arrive in relationship to the party? Were they there a day or two before, or did Austin whisk Dareus away from the airport to the agent’s party while furiously scribbling out a receipt and making change for the plane ticket that Dareus paid for?
“When Dareus discovered there were agents at the party, he asked to leave.”
Really? You’ve seen the pictures. Who left that party? On the other hand, of all the whoppers in Dareus’ story, this is the most believable. I will concede that if he found out the party was not he thought it was, he may have asked to leave.
“Then he received grim news that his mother, Michelle Luckey, had died, and he abruptly returned to Birmingham.”
Holy timeline problem, Batman! The famous pictures of Austin put the party on May 15, but Dareus’ mother passed on May 18. Not quite an abrupt departure. So where was Dareus and what was he doing for three days in Miami while not sleeping in the hotel room Austin supposedly arranged for him?
Last week, when reports surfaced about Austin’s possible involvement with agents, Dareus was urged to call Alabama coach Nick Saban, a source close to the family said. The player and coach met late Sunday morning.
Oh, really? Dareus was so concerned about being at a party with agents that he asked to leave, but didn’t bother telling his coach or Alabama’s compliance office until three days after the Marvin Austin news broke, over two months after the party? Sounds more to me like he realized they were looking at who might have been at the party and he decided he needed to cover his six.
“[Dareus] is described as trusting, naive and gullible. As his mother’s health declined in the spring following a lengthy illness, he was particularly vulnerable, a source said.”
Give me a break. Oh, poor Marcell, lured to Miami by that evil Marvin Austin. He was so naive, and particularly with his mama sick and all. Remember what Annie Savoy said about women in “Bull Durham”: “you’re too strong and powerful for that. Now say it — ‘I didn’t get lured and I will take responsibility for my actions’.”
Given how ridiculous Dareus’ defense by his unknown person close to the family was, I can’t believe the Birmingham paper even ran this, other than the fact that someone actually spoke to them (which, if you believe the ChaRaleigh Observer & Observer is the only time you can print something).
Moreover, I can’t believe those non-UNC sites in the blogosphere who have done more posts than this here site on the Austin situation would spend more trying to prop up the Dareus piece than to analyze it and see it for the farce it is. Even Alabama fans aren’t buying this sap story.
In no way am I exonerating Austin if he is in fact found to have compromised his eligibility. But anyone who lends any weight to this particular defense of Dareus drinks a very Crimson Kool-Aid…or a very red one.
![[Bloglines]](http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/bloglines.png)
![[del.icio.us]](http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Facebook]](http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/facebook.png)
![[MySpace]](http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/myspace.png)
![[Technorati]](http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/technorati.png)
![[Windows Live]](http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/windowslive.png)
![[Yahoo!]](http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/yahoo.png)
![[Email]](http://www.tarheelfanblog.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)
from another IC poster a bit ago.
feel free to delete it, THF, if i really shouldnt be reposting from other sites.
i hope this guy’s source doesnt know what he thinks he knows.
“The biggest detail to his info was that the NCAA is trying to determine whether or not any of our coaches knew about this party. If any of our coaches knew about this there will be sanctions against the program. Then he mentioned something about “Black Santa” and his agent being on the hot seat. Player #8’s father also hurt our case with the info he came forward with. Not sure if this was something on TWITTER or was told to an investigator. He also said minimum of 5 maximum of 8 players suspended for this season. That blew me away because I never thought that many players were involved. He didn’t know the names he was only given a number. Other than #8 and #9 I don’t know who the other players are. If I could go back in time I would destroy TWITTER.
My man is very credible. He wouldn’t lie. He has a friend that works at the NCAA in Indy that was telling him what he knew off the record.”
that post will be a good test of how much stock any of us should put into people who write clearly, dont seem to have an agenda, and arent generally inflammatory.
this guy has 4500 posts over there so it isnt some State fan who just signed up to post it.
5 players for the year sounds way overboard from what we’ve heard so far.
^That’s just more unsubstantiated — and unsubstantiable — rumormongering. The internet is full of those right now, and if you let each new steaming batch jerk you around, you’re really giving yourself more emotional distress than you need in your life. Trust only what reports come down from credible sources — UNC, AP, ESPN, IC’s reporters (not any of their board posters, no matter how supposedly “in the know” they are) — and look at everything else as scuttlebutt that needs to be ignored. That includes, but is not limited to, all message boards, SFN, the ‘Bama SBNation site, National Football Post, and the News & Observer, which lost all credibility in reporting this situation the moment Giglio’s editors allowed him to cite Twitter as “evidence”.
The N&O created a major issue for themselves when they inexplicably printed a Sunday paper, three days after the story broke with nary a mention of the NCAA investigation but had two articles about Dean Smith and two fluff pieces about UNC football. That set off the black helicopter crowd in Wolfpack Nation and it also looked really bad.
As a result, I think Giglio and ACC Now felt they needed to “catch up” so they posted everything they could get and even hat tipped SFN in the process. SFN went in full bore because they felt the N&O dropped the ball so they compensated by putting out everything they could find. UNC’s silence, which remains the correct approach IMO, does create a vacuum and this is the result.
I have a tough time buying IC posters most of the time. Some of the stuff is simply too neatly packaged. I have serious doubts someone at the NCAA is gabbing to a friend with that many specifics. Also, the NCAA has guidelines on what percentage of games will be missed for certain degrees of improper benefits. I do not see them sitting that many players for a whole season unless they are simply insane with power and want to prove a point. Not sure what point that would be. If the intention is going after the agents is the NCAA so hellbent on that they would be willing to leave this much collateral damage in their wake?
here’s an interesting story about basketball recruiting that covers an anonymous survey of some coaches and what they think/hate about it.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/columns/story?columnist=oneil_dana&id=5398415
of note are the two ways recruits can get money from agents. prepaid debit cards, for example.
and all 20 coaches said theyve lost a recruit because they wouldnt/couldnt get a relative a job.
sounds like that despite reasonable to even unreasonable efforts made by the NCAA, there are just too many sharks in the water out there.